Architects And Engineers For 9/11 Truth.
#1
Posted 28 January 2011 - 01:54 AM
In my opinion the best evidence to proof this subject has nothing to do with freaky conspiracy theories.
Itīs about science.
here is a video of a presentation Blueprint for Truth
and this is the website A&E for 9/11 Truth
#2
Posted 28 January 2011 - 03:42 AM
#3
Posted 28 January 2011 - 04:16 AM
In my opinion the best evidence to proof this subject has nothing to do with freaky conspiracy theories.
Itīs about science.
here is a video of a presentation Blueprint for Truth
and this is the website A&E for 9/11 Truth
wow so you are one of those people?
#4
Posted 28 January 2011 - 02:19 PM
Ever seen Blueprint for Truth?
#5
Posted 28 January 2011 - 02:23 PM
In my opinion the best evidence to proof this subject has nothing to do with freaky conspiracy theories.
Itīs about science.
here is a video of a presentation Blueprint for Truth
and this is the website A&E for 9/11 Truth
wow so you are one of those people?
Yes, this makes more sense to me than the 9/11 commission report.
#6
Posted 28 January 2011 - 03:19 PM
In my opinion the best evidence to proof this subject has nothing to do with freaky conspiracy theories.
Itīs about science.
here is a video of a presentation Blueprint for Truth
and this is the website A&E for 9/11 Truth
wow so you are one of those people?
Yes, this makes more sense to me than the 9/11 commission report.
what about it makes sense?
#7
Posted 28 January 2011 - 03:23 PM
#8
Posted 28 January 2011 - 03:28 PM
the guy is from germany. those foriegners will believe anything
#9
Posted 28 January 2011 - 03:30 PM
#10
Posted 28 January 2011 - 03:40 PM
#11
Posted 28 January 2011 - 04:35 PM
#12
Posted 28 January 2011 - 04:41 PM
YOU'RE
#13
Posted 28 January 2011 - 04:43 PM
YOU'RE
#14
Posted 28 January 2011 - 05:01 PM
#15
Posted 28 January 2011 - 05:04 PM
I think it was more sarcasm aimed at other board inhabitants, rather than being an actual grammar nazi.
#16
Posted 28 January 2011 - 05:04 PM
if you cant tell by the laughing emoticons after my post meant it was a joke (and not even actually at your expense, but the departed sally's) then you missed my point entirely.
i make more typos than a publishing house full of dyslexics, yiou know?
#17
Posted 28 January 2011 - 05:06 PM
if you cant tell by the laughing emoticons after my post meant it was a joke (and not even actually at your expense, but the departed sally's) then you missed my point entirely.
i make more typos than a publishing house full of dyslexics, yiou know?
calm down shitstand. horses heart is in the right place
#18
Posted 28 January 2011 - 05:09 PM
#19
Posted 28 January 2011 - 05:12 PM
if you cant tell by the laughing emoticons after my post meant it was a joke (and not even actually at your expense, but the departed sally's) then you missed my point entirely.
i make more typos than a publishing house full of dyslexics, yiou know?
calm down shitstand. horses heart is in the right place
calmer than you are
#20
Posted 28 January 2011 - 05:12 PM
if you cant tell by the laughing emoticons after my post meant it was a joke (and not even actually at your expense, but the departed sally's) then you missed my point entirely.
i make more typos than a publishing house full of dyslexics, yiou know?
calm down shitstand. horses heart is in the right place
calmer than you are
im smoking weed right now dude. im good to go
#21
Posted 28 January 2011 - 05:42 PM
and this was a nice burn tater nuts
edit- but if you believe, you can lower your electric bill!!!!!!!!!!!
#22
Posted 28 January 2011 - 05:45 PM
#23
Posted 28 January 2011 - 06:21 PM
#24
Posted 28 January 2011 - 06:24 PM
its a conspiracy to keep people from discovering the truth about conspiracies
#25
Posted 28 January 2011 - 06:55 PM
Because so often the conspirasists are stuck on their theories & hypotheses and twist the facts to fit their theory, rather than the other way around. Of course there are plenty of real conspiracies, the rationale behind the US invading Iraq or Shell's manipulation of Nigeria's government to get the oil out are two examples off the top of my head.
The reasons & methods behind the 4 hijacked planes are open to interpretation, the actuality of those planes crashing into the WTC and Pentagon is not.
#26
Posted 28 January 2011 - 09:00 PM
#27
Posted 29 January 2011 - 11:58 AM
My words exactly!
Someone would have blabbed.
#28
Posted 29 January 2011 - 12:10 PM

They're on it.
#29
Posted 29 January 2011 - 01:10 PM
You didnīt answer my question, so i believe you didnīt whatch it anyway. But talking of convincing some, what does it need in your opinion? A big assed high rent hollywood production? Come on, that guy is an architect collaborating whit other engineers, iīm not naive and i donīt fall for conspiracy theories, but what exactly is your profession to think this organisation is talking bullshit?
#30
Posted 29 January 2011 - 03:05 PM
Architectural and Engineering Professionals who support Architects And Engineers For 9/11 Truth: 1,425
American Institute of Architects Members: 83,500+
National Council of Structural Engineers Association Members: 12,000 (in 2003)
1425/(83500+12000) = 0.015 or 1.5%.
So, taking into account that there is probably more than 83,500 members of AIA, less than 1.5% of professionals have signed up for this.
Edit: there's obviously inadequacies involved with getting figures from the internet, but I think that my reckoning is fairly sound.
*pushes glasses up nose*
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
-
Bing (1)










