Reeder & Homme File Against Kyuss Lives
#1
Posted 10 March 2012 - 04:45 AM
#2
Posted 10 March 2012 - 07:50 AM
#3
Posted 10 March 2012 - 08:35 AM
Also, it's not like the Kyuss name is hugely huge or anything. Anyone who knows who Kyuss were probably pays enough attention that they will look into new stuff these guys do regardless of what the band is called.

#4
Posted 10 March 2012 - 08:52 AM
sad price of getting bigger and having some degree of fame in a situation like this, friendships can be affected over things out of everyone's control
sad sad sad for all
#5
Posted 10 March 2012 - 09:33 AM
#6
Posted 10 March 2012 - 10:31 AM
Is this what you wanted it to be? Don't you think it's time to rip off the blindfold; or just keep doing what you're told?
#7
Posted 10 March 2012 - 10:37 AM
What is he supposed to do flip burgers?
While this is sad to hear, I'd be much sadder to go into a burger king and see John Garcia there, or walk by Nick doing construction which is what he was doing prior to KL. It's one thing to be a sellout, it's another to need to sell some tickets to maintain a decent quality of life which given the music they have given to us in the past, they should live comfortably for the rest of their lives in exchange for it, but sadly that's not how the world works.
#8
Posted 10 March 2012 - 11:06 AM
After that, the way that Scott Reeder has been treated by his band"mates" like shit. Nickfag not allowing Scott on stage. What is underneath, was posted by Scott on Fiercebook.
"Joe, that sounds good, like when Pigmy Love Circus's bassist invited me to play the whole second half of their last gig. Ruled! But last night at dinner, I got the word that it would really bum N.O. out, turning the gig "into a weird bass competition." If that's the case, it would've been a pleasure to wipe the stage with him! It's all good. The truth sets you free..."
And... it seems that Josh and Scott tried to wait as long with going to court as possible. I hope justice will be served. And's that's with Scott and Josh.
#9
Posted 10 March 2012 - 12:25 PM
we can comment and analyse but unless you are a part of it and know all the details and goings on behind the scenes in both camps it's hard to judge which way this will go and whether it is 'fair'.
All I will say is I have enjoyed seeing the 2 Kyuss Lives shows I have been too and I am still a massive Queens/TCV/Josh Idoliser so either way this case goes unless it's settled evenly (which I doubt it will be) it will be sad.
#10
Posted 10 March 2012 - 12:48 PM
#11
Posted 10 March 2012 - 02:03 PM
What is this bullshit?! The fucking Spice Girls?!?!?!
I'm sorry for all involved, but for us fans; it only comes off as pure stinking CRAP!!! WORK IT FUCKING OUT FELLAS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#12
Posted 10 March 2012 - 02:07 PM
Pick a different name, create cool music, make your own reputation.
#13
Posted 10 March 2012 - 02:11 PM
Sounds like there was no real problem with "Kyuss Lives", but John/Brant were trying to trademark "Kyuss" for themselves. I dont agree with that.
bingo
#14
Posted 10 March 2012 - 02:44 PM
I dunno, how many bands have continued without original members in the past? Lots of them - it used to be accepted that once you left the rest carried on if they wanted. It's just corporate bullshit - why should someone receive money for stuff the others do without them?
#15
Posted 10 March 2012 - 03:47 PM
I dunno, how many bands have continued without original members in the past? Lots of them - it used to be accepted that once you left the rest carried on if they wanted. It's just corporate bullshit - why should someone receive money for stuff the others do without them?
I think it's the whole point that they're doing it, using all Josh's riffs, all his guitar work, so Kyuss IS basically his thing. Without his work in it, who would they be?
Shit I'd wanna sue somebody if they're using my name for themselves and not giving me credit for having my own name.
#16
Posted 10 March 2012 - 05:23 PM
#17
Posted 10 March 2012 - 05:24 PM
BUT, when you take what was something created out of fun/ love of music/ whatever and incorporate money into it, things may change for certain people. And from the outside, if all this is about copyright and the name, then at the very least Josh has a stake in this case. If you could put a copyright on your family name, you'd probably want to take part in that too, right?
It's interesting to see how people react to this and and criticize Josh for his actions. I guess this is another part where people forget that he was a big part of the band, whether you like it or not.
#18
Posted 10 March 2012 - 05:35 PM
I dunno, how many bands have continued without original members in the past? Lots of them - it used to be accepted that once you left the rest carried on if they wanted. It's just corporate bullshit - why should someone receive money for stuff the others do without them?
I think it's the whole point that they're doing it, using all Josh's riffs, all his guitar work, so Kyuss IS basically his thing. Without his work in it, who would they be?
Shit I'd wanna sue somebody if they're using my name for themselves and not giving me credit for having my own name.
Seems to me he's been quite happy for them to play the old songs - I'm guessing he doesn't want them to take it forward and release new material using the Kyuss name. If he doesn't want to be part of it, why care so much that his former bandmates want to do something with it? It's not like he was the only songwriter, or even the main one.
#19
Posted 10 March 2012 - 05:43 PM
#20
Posted 10 March 2012 - 06:04 PM
I agree that they should stick to Kyuss Lives, it makes it both Kyuss and their own thing at the same time. Reading between the lines, I'm guessing the suit is to stop them recording under anything with Kyuss in the name.
And how exactly is it "consumer fraud" as alleged?
#21
Posted 10 March 2012 - 06:38 PM
What an unholy mess.
Maybe Scott and Josh should form their own version of the band (with Alfredo maybe?) and go on their own tour
#22
Posted 10 March 2012 - 06:40 PM
I agree that they should stick to Kyuss Lives, it makes it both Kyuss and their own thing at the same time. Reading between the lines, I'm guessing the suit is to stop them recording under anything with Kyuss in the name.
And how exactly is it "consumer fraud" as alleged?
Sounds to me like "Kyuss Lives" was fine for all parties, but then Nick/John/Bruno wanted to go by the name "Kyuss" and Josh and Scott wont have any part of it.
#23
Posted 10 March 2012 - 07:17 PM
#24
Posted 10 March 2012 - 07:19 PM
Then it will be Brant and John + two random people.
But they will still charge $150 extra for VIP tickets...
#25
Posted 10 March 2012 - 08:00 PM
What is he supposed to do flip burgers?
While this is sad to hear, I'd be much sadder to go into a burger king and see John Garcia there, or walk by Nick doing construction which is what he was doing prior to KL. It's one thing to be a sellout, it's another to need to sell some tickets to maintain a decent quality of life which given the music they have given to us in the past, they should live comfortably for the rest of their lives in exchange for it, but sadly that's not how the world works.
No, I get that you have to do what you can to make money, but it's always bothered me a bit that he was so upfront about the fact that it is about the money. I'm not really happy about what either side is doing, you know? I feel like Josh has enough going for him to where he could let it go, and I've never been a big fan of the Kyuss Lives! project. But, hey, who am I to tell anyone else what to do? It's just kind of weird that this is going on because, correct me if I'm wrong, didn't Josh say somewhere that he respected what they were doing, but that it wasn't for him? Or something along those lines?
Is this what you wanted it to be? Don't you think it's time to rip off the blindfold; or just keep doing what you're told?
#26
Posted 10 March 2012 - 08:11 PM
Then it will be Brant and John + two random people.
But they will still charge $150 extra for VIP tickets...
Indeed
#27
Posted 10 March 2012 - 09:14 PM
Sure seems to me like Nick/Brant/John tried to screw over Scott and Josh. But of course, we don't yet know (and may never know) the full story.
#28
Posted 10 March 2012 - 09:37 PM
check the first post in this thread
#29
Posted 10 March 2012 - 10:13 PM
#30
Posted 10 March 2012 - 10:32 PM
IT AINT FAIR
IT AINT DONE
IT AINT UP TO ME!!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










